Ian Plimer: Climate change denier AND annoying git

authordefault
on

Monbiot/Plimer debate:ย Update

It would appear from Ian Plimerโ€™s latest response in the back and forth with UK Gardian columnist George Monbiot that Plimer has no intention of taking seriously either the climate change issue – or his commitment to debate it in goodย faith.

Plimer had earlier agreed to answer a series of questions relating to his new book, Heaven and Earth, as a starting point in a debate with Monbiot. Instead of doing so, however, the Aussie professor has chosen instead to submit a host of unanswerable science questions toย Monbiot.

This is an annoying dodge, transparently designed to distract everyone from the fact that Professor Plimer canโ€™t – or wonโ€™t – account for the content of his ownย book.

Related Posts

on

Seemingly unlikely alliances are springing up in Canada and the U.S. to prevent rural communities from becoming a โ€˜toxic CO2 dumping groundโ€™.

Seemingly unlikely alliances are springing up in Canada and the U.S. to prevent rural communities from becoming a โ€˜toxic CO2 dumping groundโ€™.
on

New controversy adds to scrutiny of party's finances.

New controversy adds to scrutiny of party's finances.
Analysis
on

The prime minister should consider the potential outcomes of siding with his Bay Street buddies and oil industry bigwigs over climate-beleaguered Canadians.

The prime minister should consider the potential outcomes of siding with his Bay Street buddies and oil industry bigwigs over climate-beleaguered Canadians.
on

As the company faces a landmark climate lawsuit, confidential documents show how British scientist James Lovelock warned executives of the risks of burning fossil fuels in the 1960s.

As the company faces a landmark climate lawsuit, confidential documents show how British scientist James Lovelock warned executives of the risks of burning fossil fuels in the 1960s.
Series: #ShellKnew
Series: #ShellKnew